Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235132›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025

Disentangling the Causal Effects of Education and Participation Bias on Alzheimer Disease Using Mendelian Randomization.

Aadrita Chatterjee, Clémence Cavaillès, Neil M Davies, Kristine Yaffe, Shea J Andrews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aadrita ChatterjeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6642-6541
Clémence CavaillèsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-2307
Neil M DaviesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-0508
Kristine YaffeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-3825
Shea J AndrewsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-9470

Funding

Elucidating the causal associations underlying Alzheimer's diseaseR00AG070109 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDREWS, SHEA J · 2023 to 2025
$742k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG070109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: People with university degrees have a lower incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the relationship between education and AD could be due to selection, collider, or ascertainment biases, such as lower familiarity with cognitive testing or the fact that those with degrees are more likely to participate in research. In this study, we use 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationships between education, participation, and AD. Methods: We used genome-wide association study summary statistics for educational attainment, 3 measures of participation, AD (clinically diagnosed AD), and AD/ADRD (AD and related dementia; includes clinical diagnosis and family history). Independent genome-wide significant single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) were extracted from the exposure data sets and harmonized with the outcome SNPs. Fixed-effects inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis was the primary MR method; Cochran Q statistic and MR Egger intercept were used to test for heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and radial MR was used to identify outliers. Sensitivity analyses included MR Egger, weighted median, and mode. Bidirectional analyses were used to test whether AD pathology affects participation, and multivariable MR (MVMR) assessed independent exposure-outcome effects. Results: Educational attainment reduced the risk of AD (OR Discussion: Univariable MR analyses indicated that education and participation reduced the risk of AD. However, MR also suggested that education increased the risk of AD/ADRD, highlighting the inconsistencies between clinical and proxy diagnoses of AD, as proxy-AD may be affected by selection, collider, or ascertainment bias. MVMR suggested that education remained associated with reduced AD risk after adjusting for participation and the protective effect of education may be due to other biological mechanisms, such as cognitive reserve.

Identifiers

PMID41235132
PMCPMC12608499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.