Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Electroencephalography-based neural indicators of texture preference for cosmetic formulations.

Hye-Ran Cheon, Gusang Kwon, Youngkyung Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Hae Kwang Lee, Jin Hee Shin, Joomi Yu, Han-Jeong Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hye-Ran CheonDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Gusang KwonAmorePacific, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Youngkyung KimAmorePacific, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunjung KimDepartment of Dermatology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Hae Kwang LeeP&K Skin Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hee ShinP&K Skin Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joomi YuDepartment of Dermatology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Han-Jeong HwangDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the correlation between subjective preferences for different cosmetic formulations and brain activity measured using electroencephalography (EEG). EEG data were collected from 29 participants when they applied three positive and one negative cosmetic formulation to the inside of their left forearms. According to the questionnaire results, the negative formulation showed significantly lower preference scores than the positive formulations. Additionally, significant EEG-preference correlations were consistently found in the delta and alpha bands within the sensorimotor areas closely related to tactile processing and its emotional regulation. In particular, stronger correlations were observed when only the two positive formulations with higher preferences were included in the analysis or when specific frequency bands showing significant results were combined together. These findings demonstrate the potential of predicting cosmetic preferences based on EEG data and highlight the crucial role of texture sensation in shaping user choice.

Indexed as

correlationcosmeticelectroencephalography (EEG)formulationpreference

Identifiers

PMID41235175
PMCPMC12605486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.