Evidence mapPaperPMID 41235274Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Association between social participation and hope levels in stroke patients: a cross-sectional study.

Miao Liu, Yan Liu, Tian Li, Jiying Yang, Juan Wang, Hen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miao LiuRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yan LiuRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tian LiRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jiying YangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Juan WangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hen WangRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Exploring Factors Influencing the Level of Hope in Stroke Patients and Its Relationship with Social Participation. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at Wuhan University People's Hospital from March to June 2024 and performed a correlation analysis on the sample data. Using convenience sampling, we enrolled 122 stroke patients who met the inclusion criteria. Participants completed questionnaires assessing social participation (Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire, IPA), hope (Herth Hope Index, HHI), activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and sociodemographic/disease characteristics. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 with descriptive statistics, Results: Participants demonstrated moderate social participation impairment (IPA: 32.60 ± 16.32), with the most pronounced limitations in autonomous participation in family roles (subscore: 11.10 ± 6.17). Hope levels averaged within the moderate range (HHI: 30.81 ± 7.28). Furthermore, significant negative correlations existed between all dimensions of social participation and all dimensions of hope ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates that stroke survivors exhibit moderate impairments in social participation and hope levels. These findings suggest that rehabilitation programs should prioritize social participation enhancement while providing targeted interventions for female patients and those with lower socioeconomic status or poorer functional ability. Further longitudinal research is needed to establish causal relationships and optimize intervention strategies.

Indexed as

correlational studyhoperehabilitationsocial participationstroke

Identifiers

PMID41235274
PMCPMC12605478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.