ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
The Learning Curve of Reverse-Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: CUSUM Analysis.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction (RSEM-IPI) has been described as a safe and feasible procedure for early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve for RSEM-IPI. Methods: Between January 2023 and February 2024, we collected data on 104 consecutive patients who underwent RSEM-IPI at our hospital (53 for group 1 and 51 for group 2). The surgeons in group 1 completed the endoscopic training and assistance, whereas the surgeons in group 2 did not. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to assess changes in the operative times across the case sequence. Results: Among the 281 patients who received breast reconstruction surgeries, a total of 104 consecutive data were recorded and eligible. Both groups had higher rates of postoperative complications including bleeding, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia, skin ischemia, infection and longer drainage duration during the phrase 1 compared to the phrase 2. Notably, in terms of the most severe postoperative complications, implant expose and loss, both groups exhibited higher rates during the phrase 1. Breast-Q scores for group 1 in phases 1 and 2 were 66 and 84, respectively, while for group 2, they were 67 and 80. As compared with surgeons in group 2, well-trained surgeons in group 1 were more accessible for stable learning curve with fewer training patients (18 patients) and relatively lower rate of postoperative complications ( Conclusion: The estimated learning curve for RSEM-IPI was achieved after 18 cases in the well-trained surgeon group. The endoscopic training and assistance were critical to master the breast endoscopic surgeries for breast surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.