Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235644›Full record

ArticleHealthcare management forum2026

A Scoping Review of Interventions Using an interRAI Information System to Guide Care Management and Assess Intervention Efficacy in Older Adults.

Nick W Bray, Sydney MacNinch, Nazanin Nasiri, Jasmine Friedrich Yap, Ilona Barańska, Emmanuel Bagaragaza, George Heckman, Johanna de Almeida Mello, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Caitlin McArthur

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare management forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nick W BrayMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5831-7842
Sydney MacNinchDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nazanin NasiriDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jasmine Friedrich YapDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ilona BarańskaJagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Emmanuel BagaragazaEtablissements Jeanne Garnier, Paris, France.
George HeckmanLawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-3287
Johanna de Almeida MelloKU Leuven, Belgium.
Katarzyna SzczerbińskaJagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Caitlin McArthurDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

interRAI instruments consist of clinical information systems able to support integrated care. Through a scoping review, we describe how interRAI instruments are used: (1) as interventions (implementation category) and (2) to evaluate interventions (efficacy category) in older adults. In accordance with the PRISMA-ScR framework, we searched 6 databases and conducted dual-independent screening, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction followed an identical procedure. The review yielded 64 manuscripts, including 43 and 21 categorized as studies of efficacy or implementation, respectively. Findings indicate that interRAI systems are consistently utilized to evaluate or enhance participant-centred outcomes across diverse healthcare settings in 17 countries, with a particular emphasis on home and long-term care. interRAI is a versatile system with the potential to form the foundation of an integrated clinical information system. This review provides a basis for future research testing novel intervention strategies with interRAI systems.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPatient Care ManagementAgedHumans

Identifiers

PMID41235644
PMCPMC12876413

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.