ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B-related recompensated vs. compensated cirrhosis.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing epidemiology and etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe: implications for clinical practice and health policy.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of ablation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatitis B-related compensated cirrhosis versus those with recompensated cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we enrolled hepatitis B-related HCC patients (73 with recompensated cirrhosis and 666 with compensated cirrhosis) who underwent ablation between January 2009 and February 2024. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics, resulting in 73 matched pairs. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complications were compared.
resultsA total of 739 patients (median age, 59 years [interquartile range, 53-66 years]; 579 men [78.2%]) were enrolled. Following propensity score matching procedures, no significant difference in major complications was observed between patients with recompensated cirrhosis and those with compensated cirrhosis (6.8% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.438). Critically, no postoperative liver failure or decompensation events occurred after ablation therapy in patients with either recompensated cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis. Moreover, RFS was comparable between patients with recompensated cirrhosis and those with compensated cirrhosis (73.7% vs. 74.0% at 1 year; 43.3% vs. 43.2% at 3 years; 24.8% vs. 36.9% at 5 years; p = 0.699). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 97.3%, 84.5%, and 73.4% in patients with recompensated cirrhosis, and 98.6%, 92.7%, and 83.7% in patients with compensated cirrhosis, respectively (p = 0.363).
conclusionsAblation therapy is effective and safe in HCC patients with hepatitis B-related recompensated cirrhosis, representing a viable curative option for these patients. KEY POINTS: Question Is ablation as safe and effective for patients with hepatitis B-related recompensated cirrhosis as it is for those with compensated cirrhosis? Findings The incidence of major complications and long-term survival did not differ statistical significantly between patients with hepatitis B-related recompensated cirrhosis and those with compensated cirrhosis. Clinical relevance Ablation therapy is effective and safe in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatitis B-related recompensated cirrhosis, representing a viable curative option for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41236657What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.