Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236708›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026

CRISPR-Based Functional Genomics in Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Setareh Zahedi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Setareh ZahediDepartment of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal. zahedisetareh@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0008-1222-6150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of CRISPR-based functional genomics with pluripotent stem cell (PSC) technologies has been recognized as a transformative approach for investigating gene function, modeling human disease, and advancing regenerative medicine. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of recent developments in CRISPR-Cas platforms, including gene knockouts, base and prime editing, and CRISPR activation or interference (CRISPRa/i), as applied to PSC systems. Studies employing human PSCs, including embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, have been examined to summarize methodologies for genome-wide screening, lineage tracing, and therapeutic engineering. Advances in editing efficiency, delivery strategies, and genomic safety have been reported, while limitations persist in the form of off-target modifications, epigenetic variability, and cell-type-specific responses. Notable applications include the generation of immune-evasive PSC lines, the development of organoid models for physiological and pathological studies, and the implementation of phenotypic screening for disease-relevant traits. Collectively, these technological and methodological advancements have established functional genomics of PSC-CRISPRSPR as a versatile and powerful framework for elucidating fundamental aspects of human biology, dissecting complex traits, and accelerating the translation of discoveries from experimental research to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenomicsPluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsGene EditingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCRISPRCRISPR-Cas systemsEmbryonic stem cellsFunctional genomicsGenome editingInduced pluripotent stem cellsorganoidsPluripotent stem cellsRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID41236708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.