Observational studyBlood advances2025
Artificial intelligence-based flow cytometry for the diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04952974 (Study of Cell Markers of Marginal Zone Lymphoma and Other B-cell Chronic Lymphoid Malignancies), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Cell Markers of Marginal Zone Lymphoma and Other B-cell Chronic Lymphoid Malignancies
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAccurate diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPDs) remains challenging due to overlapping phenotypes across subtypes. Machine learning (ML) offers promising tools to improve marker evaluation and refine flow cytometry analysis. We investigated the use of ML algorithms to evaluate the diagnostic value of incorporating CD148, CD180, and CD200 into standard B-CLPD phenotyping panel and to develop a diagnosis decision tree. We trained models with flow cytometry data from 480 patients with B-CLPDs using XGBoost and DecisionTree algorithms. The final models integrated 2 categorical markers (CD5 and CD10) and quantiles of fluorescence intensity of 4 quantitative markers (CD20, CD180, and CD200) to classify 6 B-CLPD subtypes. These trained models were applied to an independent cohort of 433 patients with B-CLPD analyzed on a different flow cytometer platform. DecisionTree models achieved the highest classification accuracy (mean accuracy, 0.88) in the validation cohort. The overall specificity ranged from 0.95 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) to 1 hairy cell leukemia (HCL), whereas sensitivity varied from 0.75 (LPL) to 1 (HCL). The DecisionTree model demonstrated superior identification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia compared to a Matutes score of 4 or 5 (P = .029). In more than half of the cases, a diagnosis was determined with near certainty using only the cytometry data. For the remaining cases, a hierarchical approach incorporating additional tests was proposed. For practical implementation, an interactive interface provides diagnostic predictions, positive predictive values, and Gini index scores. This study establishes a ML-optimized strategy for B-CLPD classification, combining phenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data to enhance diagnostic accuracy of leukemic B-CLPD cells. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04952974.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.