ArticleJAMA network open2025
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Hepatitis C Infection.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an oncovirus, its association with the risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. In addition, it is unknown whether there is differential risk for PDAC across HCV genotypes. Objective: To assess the association between chronic HCV and PDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, national, population-based cohort study was conducted across Veterans Health Administration (VA) sites. The study included veterans with HCV testing documented in the VA or VA-linked Medicare with at least 1 inpatient or outpatient visit between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2020. Patients were followed-up for at least 18 months after this visit. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to September 2025. Exposure: HCV status was categorized as chronic HCV, exposure to HCV, or no chronic HCV infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association of HCV status with PDAC was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders. Analysis was substratified by HCV genotype. Results: Of 6 330 856 people tested for HCV (5 841 571 men [92.3%]; median [IQR] age, 61.6 years [49.9-70.1]), 246 218 (3.9%) had chronic HCV and 209 492 (3.3%) were exposed. Of the 33 451 individuals (0.5%) who developed PDAC, age at diagnosis was younger among those with vs those without HCV (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [59.9-69.6] years vs 72.4 [66.7-79.0] years). Compared with no HCV infection, chronic HCV infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.67-1.86) and HCV exposure (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI; 1.11-1.25) were associated with increased risk of incident PDAC. Hazards for PDAC were greater for HCV genotype 3 (aHR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.67-2.45) and genotype 1 (aHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.64-1.87) than for genotype 2 (aHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.60) compared with no HCV infection. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of veterans, chronic HCV infection was associated with a 1.8-fold higher risk of PDAC diagnosis, and HCV genotypes 3 and 1 had greater PDAC risk than genotype 2. These findings prompt future research on the mechanisms underlying this association and the impact of HCV treatment on PDAC risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.