Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41237109›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Obscured-ensemble models for genomic prediction.

Rounak Saha, Amir Morshedian, Jia Sun, Robert Duncan, Mike Domaratzki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir MorshedianDepartment of Computer Science, Western University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-9843
Jia SunDepartment of Plant Science, University of Manitoba.
Robert DuncanDepartment of Plant Science, University of Manitoba.
Mike DomaratzkiDepartment of Computer Science, Western University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-6676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic Prediction (GP) uses dense whole-genome marker sets from lines of a crop to predict agronomic traits for untested genotypes. In recent years, deep learning (DL) approaches for genomic prediction have demonstrated state-of-the-art results. However, substantial variation exists in DL outcomes for GP as the success of DL is dependent on the architecture of the model used, as well as the amount of data available and the population structure of the individuals in the training set. In this paper, we consider an obscured model for GP, where the model is not provided with genomic content. The obscured model was intended to evaluate the possibility of so-called shortcut learning in GP.We conclude that we can perform GP using the obscured model with only 20% of the obscured markers from each reference genotype. This selective feature usage significantly enhances the efficiency of our model without compromising accuracy. By eliminating markers, we demonstrate that the model is not relying on linkage to perform shortcut learning. Further, we consider a deep learning ensemble method for genomic prediction based on the obscured model. The ensemble model we develop here shows success as a method for GP by using the similarity to each of the elements of a training set of genotypes, as well as the performance of the genotypes. We evaluate the obscured ensemble model for GP. We demonstrate that the obscured ensemble model is successful even with a limited number of genotypes used for prediction. Further, random selection of a subset of genotypes is sufficient to ensure successful performance.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticDeep LearningGenetic MarkersGenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID41237109
PMCPMC12617858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.