ArticlePloS one2025
A physiologically-based model of localized mucociliary clearance in the airways.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mucociliary clearance (MC) system clears mucus, pathogens, and toxins from the airways. Whole lung MC rate can be measured using gamma camera imaging after the inhalation of radiolabeled particulate. We sought a means to evaluate the therapeutic effect of clearance enhancing therapies in different airway size groups. We developed a mathematical model of mucus transport in the right lung that, when informed by imaging data, estimates MC rate and unclearable activity at points across the airway tree. We fit the model to imaging studies from 11 healthy controls (HC), resulting in a per-point mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.085 ± 0.016% of the total particulate deposition. Using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, we reduced the number of fitted clearance rate coefficients from 114 to 5 with only an 8.7% increase in MAE. These 5 cluster groups were closely associated with specific regions of the lung and likely with specific airway size groups. Comparing the HC group to a cystic fibrosis (CF) group we found only one cluster with significantly depressed MC rates in CF corresponding to the lower lobe. The inhalation of 7% hypertonic saline (HS) by the CF group increased MC rate in all clusters and decreased unclearable activity in 4/5 clusters. The computational model described provides detailed regional estimates of MC rate when applied to clearance imaging studies. If further informed, this model may provide a valuable tool for studying small airways obstructive disease and evaluating mucus clearance-enhancing therapies in the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.