ReviewBrain research2026
Transcription factors implicated in substance use disorder, from immediate early genes to altered gene expression.
Review in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) link external stimuli to altered gene expression in all cell types, tissues, and biological processes. Because addiction phenotypes, including substance use disorder (SUD) cause enormous human suffering, significant effort is ongoing to understand the molecular processes that underlie these conditions, including elucidating the genetic drivers of addiction. While immense progress has been made, the combination of complex, multilocus genetics, large numbers of inherited variants of small effect size, and heterogeneous cellular physiology has proved difficult to untangle. Despite these challenges, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have provided evidence for the likely causative role for some genes and pathways, and neurobiological molecular studies have implicated some cellular and physiological processes. These mechanisms include how the substance itself is processed, the subsequent induced signals that activate neurobiological responses and influence behavioral changes, and corresponding epigenetic and structural alterations of brain circuitry. These mechanisms persist for some users, contributing to the addictive phenotype. Central to this response is the activation of several transcription factors and cofactors that are considered "immediate early genes" (IEGs), which communicate signals through neurotransmitter signaling pathways in the brain. In this review, we aggregate published evidence that links TFs to SUD and summarize the key TFs (such as CREB1, FOSB, E2F3A, and EGR1) involved in shared cellular processes emphasizing the role of IEGs. We also document shared connections across substances and model organisms, with an emphasis on known epigenetic interactions, GWAS links, and relevance to human biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.