ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Improving Patient Access and Scanning Efficiency in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after hospitalization for acute heart failure: insights from the French nationwide OFICA-2 cohort.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Field strength dependence, physiologic correlates, and prognostic significance of ventricular blood pool T2 mapping on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a comprehensive noninvasive diagnostic tool for cardiac conditions. Factors affecting CMR efficiency include image acquisition, analysis, patient compliance, scan times, scanner accessibility, and expert personnel availability. PROJECT RATIONALE: This project aimed to optimize image acquisition time and diagnostic accuracy in CMR by in-person and remote real-time supervision of pathology-driven scan protocols tailored to the most likely clinical diagnosis. PROJECT SUMMARY: A review of 343 contrast and noncontrast CMR scans revealed a statistically significant 35.1% decrease in average scan duration from preintervention to postintervention, from 94.78 to 61.49 minutes, with improved diagnostic accuracy. This decrease directly resulted in an increase in CMR scan volume of 32% at the main campus and 200% at a satellite campus, as well as the establishment of a new CMR imaging service line at a third satellite campus. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Streamlining CMR workflow improves efficiency, patient access, and diagnostic accuracy, leading to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.