ArticleScientific reports2025
Levy flight-assisted hybrid Sine-Cosine Aquila optimizer for solving chemical equilibrium problems through the Gibbs free energy minimization technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research proposes a novel hybrid metaheuristic optimization framework that combines the Aquila Optimization algorithm with the Sine-Cosine Optimizer to find equilibrium points of reacting components under specified operational reaction conditions. The method aims to address the exploitative limitations of the standard Aquila algorithm by incorporating oscillatory sine-cosine movements into the hybrid optimizer, which is one of the significant drawbacks of the base Aquila algorithm that should be addressed. The effectiveness of the hybrid approach is thoroughly tested on a suite of 100 multidimensional unimodal and multimodal benchmark cases, with results compared to those from well-known literature optimizers. Additionally, twenty-eight 30-dimensional benchmark functions from the 2013 Congress on Evolutionary Computation competition are used to evaluate the prediction performance. Three multidimensional constrained engineering design problems are also solved, and their results are compared with those from other literature optimizers. The findings show that the hybrid algorithm produces the best estimates and ranks first among competing algorithms based on average ranking results. To further verify its robustness and accuracy, three more complex chemical equilibrium problems are solved using the Gibbs Free Energy minimization method. The predictions are benchmarked against recent metaheuristic algorithms for each case, demonstrating that the proposed hybrid effectively overcomes the challenges of highly nonlinear and non-convex free energy surfaces, achieving higher solution consistency while finding minimum objective function values across different chemical equilibrium scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.