ArticleScientific reports2025
Trustworthy pneumonia detection in chest X-ray imaging through attention-guided deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From intelligent models to clinical tools: the evolving landscape of AI in medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis: Leveraging Radiomics and Dosiomics Within IDLSS Lung Subregions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumonia remains a significant global health threat, especially among children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Chest X-ray (CXR) imaging is commonly used for diagnosis, but manual interpretation is prone to errors and variability. To address these challenges, we propose a novel attention-guided deep learning framework that combines spatial, temporal, and biologically inspired processing for robust and interpretable pneumonia detection. Our method integrates convolutional operations for spatial feature extraction, gated recurrent mechanisms to capture temporal dependencies, and spike-based neural processing to mimic biological efficiency and improve noise tolerance. The inclusion of an attention mechanism enhances the model's interpretability by identifying clinically relevant regions within the images. We evaluated the proposed method on a publicly available CXR dataset, achieving a high accuracy of 99.35%, along with strong precision, recall, and F1-score. Extensive experiments demonstrate the model's robustness to various types of image distortions, including Gaussian blur, salt-and-pepper noise, and speckle noise. These results confirm the effectiveness, reliability, and transparency of the proposed approach, making it a promising tool for clinical deployment, particularly in low-resource healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.