Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238604›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trustworthy pneumonia detection in chest X-ray imaging through attention-guided deep learning.

Houmem Slimi, Ala Balti, Sabeur Abid, Mounir Sayadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Houmem SlimiResearch Laboratory SIME, ENSIT, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia. s.houmem@gmail.com.
Ala BaltiResearch Laboratory SIME, ENSIT, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sabeur AbidResearch Laboratory SIME, ENSIT, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Mounir SayadiResearch Laboratory SIME, ENSIT, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia remains a significant global health threat, especially among children, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Chest X-ray (CXR) imaging is commonly used for diagnosis, but manual interpretation is prone to errors and variability. To address these challenges, we propose a novel attention-guided deep learning framework that combines spatial, temporal, and biologically inspired processing for robust and interpretable pneumonia detection. Our method integrates convolutional operations for spatial feature extraction, gated recurrent mechanisms to capture temporal dependencies, and spike-based neural processing to mimic biological efficiency and improve noise tolerance. The inclusion of an attention mechanism enhances the model's interpretability by identifying clinically relevant regions within the images. We evaluated the proposed method on a publicly available CXR dataset, achieving a high accuracy of 99.35%, along with strong precision, recall, and F1-score. Extensive experiments demonstrate the model's robustness to various types of image distortions, including Gaussian blur, salt-and-pepper noise, and speckle noise. These results confirm the effectiveness, reliability, and transparency of the proposed approach, making it a promising tool for clinical deployment, particularly in low-resource healthcare environments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPneumoniaRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsChest X-rayConvolutional neural networks (CNNs)Gated recurrent units (GRUs)Image classificationMRISpiking neural network (SNN)

Identifiers

PMID41238604
PMCPMC12618509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.