ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of image preprocessing methods on MRI radiomics feature variability and classification performance in Parkinson's disease motor subtype analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preprocessing methods on radiomic feature reproducibility and classification performance in differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) motor subtypes. We analyzed 210 T1-weighted MRI scans from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database, including 140 PD patients (70 tremor-dominant (TD), 70 postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD)) and 70 healthy controls. Five preprocessing pipelines were applied, and 22,560 radiomic features were extracted from 16 brain regions. Feature reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were developed using all features and only reproducible features to compare classification performance across preprocessing methods. Wavelet-based features showed the highest reproducibility, with 37% demonstrating excellent ICC values (≥ 0.90). Excluding non-reproducible features generally improved classification performance. Specific results include: (1) The Smallest Univalue Segment Assimilating Nucleus (SUSAN) denoising + Bias field correction + Z-score Normalization (S + B + ZN) method achieved the highest Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve (AUC) (0.88) before feature exclusion. (2) After excluding non-reproducible features, the Bias field correction + Z-score Normalization (B + ZN) method showed the most significant improvement, with AUC increasing from 0.49 to 0.64. (3) Texture-based features, particularly from Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM), were among the most reproducible across preprocessing methods. MRI preprocessing methods significantly impact radiomic feature reproducibility and subsequent classification performance in PD motor subtype analysis. Wavelet-based and texture features demonstrated high reproducibility, while excluding non-reproducible features generally improved classification accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of careful preprocessing method selection and feature reproducibility assessment in developing robust radiomics-based classification models for PD subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.