ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk for neurocognitive impairment in Korean childhood cancer survivors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive complaints and their associations with role functioning limitations among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors in Hong Kong.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Neurocognitive impairment is one of the serious treatment-related late complications of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). This study aimed to evaluate neurocognitive impairment of Korean CCS at their adolescent and young age for whom little was known. Method We recruited 720 Korean CCS diagnosed with primary cancer before the age of 19 years and 222 siblings of CCS. We measured neurocognitive function using the Korean version of Neurocognitive Questionnaire (K-NCQ) composed of four subdomains, with cut-off level of impairment set at the upper 10% of score distribution among sibling group. We evaluated the risk of neurocognitive impairment in CCS as compared with sibling by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results Average (standard deviation) ages of CCS at cancer diagnosis and at survey was 9.3 (5.3) and 17.6 (5.1) years, respectively. Compared with siblings, prevalence and adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of neurocognitive impairment were significantly higher in CCS with CNS solid tumor for task efficiency (31.5% vs. 16.2%, 2.58(1.47, 4.50)) and organization (24.1% vs. 13.5%, 2.70(1.44, 5.07)) subdomains. Consistent findings were observed in the subgroup analysis of 156 CCS with sibling participants and their siblings (n = 183). However, CCS with non-CNS solid tumor or hematologic malignancy showed no increased risk of impairment for four subdomains of K-NCQ. Conclusion Young-aged Korean CNS solid tumor survivors may have a higher risk of neurocognitive impairment for task efficiency and organization subdomains. However, neurocognitive function for memory and emotional regulation subdomains did not differ between CCS and siblings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.