ArticleScientific reports2025
Systems biology modelling based evaluation of omega-3 formulation in managing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural therapies for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease management often use nutraceuticals and herbal supplements to improve lipid profiles. This in-silico study examined the effects of Omega-3 fatty acids, specifically Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on lipid metabolism using systems biology-based models. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of EPA (1 g) and DHA (1 g) were analysed to understand their lipid-lowering mechanisms. The study also assessed the impact of omega-3 fatty acid-based formulation, (EPA 180 mg and DHA 120 mg), on lipid biomarkers in a simulated disease population. Over six months, the model predicted a 14.7% reduction in triglycerides, 1.7% reduction in total cholesterol, 3.7% increase in LDL, and a 22.38% increase in HDL. Non-traditional markers improved markedly, with triglyceride-to-HDL ratio reduced by 31%, total cholesterol-to-HDL by 21%, and LDL-to-HDL by 16%. A population-level subgroup analysis showed that individuals with high baseline lipid ratios (triglyceride-to-HDL > 8, total cholesterol-to-HDL > 12, LDL-to-HDL > 8) could achieve > 35% reductions within six months. These in-silico findings highlight subgroups with better predicted efficacy, guiding inclusion-exclusion criteria for future trials. Further, the study highlights the therapeutic potential of EPA and DHA in improving lipid profiles and managing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.