ReviewNature biomedical engineering2025
Barriers to translating continuous monitoring technologies for preventative medicine.
Review in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous Molecular Monitoring Using Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensors: Remaining Challenges for Long-Term In Vivo Deployment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Seamless human electronics interfacing through advanced skin attachable and implantable sensor technologies.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Carbon based functional materials enable multifunctional flexible strain sensors for wearable and implantable applications.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Predicting health and disease: a conceptual framework for AI in preventive and precision medicine.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Using Biowaste-Derived Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While treatment remains essential, disease prevention often proves more effective in improving outcomes, enhancing well-being and reducing healthcare costs. Despite this understanding, preventative medical practices are still underutilized. Continuous monitoring technologies can help to address this gap by enabling early symptom detection, tracking disease recurrence and assessing treatment responses, yet few of the technologies have been integrated into clinical practice. In this Review, we discuss notable advances in continuous monitoring and the barriers to their translation. We focus on technologies that enable either continuous measurement for at least one week or periodic measurements for at least one month, including remotely interfacing technologies, wearables and other directly interfacing systems, and internally interfacing implanted devices. Continuous monitoring improves disease-risk assessment, tracks disease progression and enhances overall health management. However, broader and more reliable datasets from diverse clinical trials, alongside supportive policies and financial incentives, will be essential to overcoming translational barriers and to integrating these technologies into healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.