ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Brugada Syndrome: an exemplar for the genomic basis of sudden death.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherited arrhythmia syndrome, Brugada Syndrome (BrS), is a leading cause of autopsy negative sudden death: the sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. Historically, BrS was believed to exhibit a Mendelian (autosomal dominant) mode of inheritance, caused by rare variants in SCN5A, the gene coding for the alpha subunit of the main cardiac sodium voltage channel. Challenges to this paradigm have arisen. For example, the majority of BrS cases do not exhibit rare variants in SCN5A. Moreover, genotype-phenotype mismatch in families has been observed. These findings suggest a more complex genetic architecture underpinning BrS. Subsequent large genomic studies of international patient cohorts have shown an unexpectedly high contribution of common genetic variation to its phenotypic development and severity. This has led to an alternative disease hypothesis whereby BrS develops as result of accumulated genetic and environmental risk surpassing a 'disease threshold' - the higher the accumulated risk, the more severe the clinical phenotype. Whilst expansion of standard clinical genetic testing to include an assessment of common variation might assist with diagnosis and phenotypic severity prediction in BrS, its incorporation into clinical practice presents inherent challenges which require careful consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.