Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238987›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026

Artificial intelligence to improve patient care in emergency medicine: a workflow-based analysis.

Francesco Franceschi, Prabakar Vaittinada Ayar, Taj Hassan, André Gries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesco FranceschiEmergency Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. francesco.franceschi@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6266-445X
Prabakar Vaittinada AyarEmergency Department, University Hospital of Orléans, University of Orléans, Orleans, France.
Taj HassanCentre for Emergency Care & Global Health, Dept of Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
André GriesEmergency Department, Observation Unit, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, artificial intelligence has had a strong impact on health sciences, including emergency medicine. There are different fields of application, from pre-hospital to in-hospital issues. Concerning pre-hospital care, it may be useful in controlling patient' transportation by public ambulance in emergency departments and improve transport time outliers. In hospital management may benefit from its ability to read out imaging or to rapidly calculate predictive scores or suggest therapeutic strategies. While the application of artificial intelligence in emergency medicine is surely intriguing, it is not free from potential risks, which in turn may overcome benefits. Since the majority of the studies are very small rather than pilot, a clear discussion among EM physicians is now necessary in order to better define the application of this technology in the real world by maximizing benefits and reducing risks.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency MedicinePatient CareWorkflowEmergency Service, HospitalHumansArtificial intelligenceEmergency MedicineIn-hospitalPre-hospital

Identifiers

PMID41238987
PMCPMC12948924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.