ArticlePulmonary therapy2026
Healthcare Resource Utilization in Refractory MACLD: Comparison of an Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension (ALIS) Cohort with a Non-ALIS Cohort.
Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amikacin Liposomal Inhalation Suspension: Advances in Application Against RefractoryInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdd-on treatment with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) to a multidrug antibiotic regimen is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MACLD). In real-world settings, other antibiotics may be added on to treat refractory MACLD. We analyzed healthcare resource utilization in a US patient population who received add-on treatment for refractory MACLD.
methodsThis was a retrospective claims analysis using Merative™ MarketScan® databases (January 2016 to December 2022). Two patient cohorts were defined: an ALIS and non-ALIS cohort. Index date was date of first prescription with ALIS or non-ALIS antibiotic for refractory MACLD. Hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related) and emergency room (ER) visits at 0-6-month and 7-12-month post-index periods were compared with baseline (6-month pre-index period) per cohort. Multivariate logistic regression models compared the odds of hospitalizations or ER visits between cohorts.
resultsThe ALIS and non-ALIS cohorts comprised 116 and 63 patients, respectively. The most common add-on treatments for refractory MACLD in the non-ALIS cohort were parenteral amikacin (41.3%) and moxifloxacin (27.0%). In the ALIS cohort, significant reductions from baseline, as compared with the 7-12-month post-index period, were observed in all-cause (12.1% vs 22.4%), respiratory-related (8.6% vs 20.7%), and NTM-related hospitalizations (9.5% vs 19.8%) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no significant changes from baseline in hospitalizations at follow-up in the non-ALIS cohort. No significant changes from baseline in ER visits or hospital length of stay were observed in either cohort. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of all-cause (OR [95% confidence interval, CI] 0.45 [0.21-0.96]) and respiratory-related hospitalizations (OR 0.44 [0.21-0.96]) were statistically significantly lower in the ALIS cohort compared with the non-ALIS cohort.
conclusionsAdd-on treatment with ALIS in refractory MACLD may lead to reductions in hospitalizations over time and lower odds of hospitalizations compared with add-on treatment with non-ALIS antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.