Trial reportFamily process2025
Group-Based Relational Savoring Intervention in Mothers of Young Children in Iran: Testing Impacts of Memory Type.
Trial report in Family process, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group-Based Relational Savoring Intervention in Mothers of Young Children in Iran: Testing Impacts of Memory Type.Family process · 2025Trial
- Mothers' responses to relational savoring as a function of attachment: A qualitative study.Infant mental health journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relational savoring, a prevention/intervention approach that involves reflecting on positive moments of connection with another person, promotes wellbeing in the parenting relationship. In this program, parents savor memories with strong attachment content (including Secure Base or Safe Haven memories), but it is currently unknown whether the benefits of relational savoring differ as a function of memory type. Within a sample of Iranian mothers of children younger than 6, this study examines impacts of RS administered in Persian on closeness to child, parental satisfaction/competence, and maternal caregiving quality. In this randomized controlled trial, 150 mothers from a city in Iran were randomized into three 50-member groups (relational savoring-Safe Haven [RS-Safe Haven]; relational savoring-Secure Base [RS-Secure Base]; Control Group). Participants completed assessments at pretest, posttest, and follow-up (3 months post-intervention). The two intervention groups (RS-Safe Haven, RS-Secure Base) participated in one-hour group relational savoring sessions that met weekly for four weeks. The Control Group received no intervention. RS interventions significantly improved maternal closeness, parental satisfaction, and maternal sensitivity/availability compared to control, with gains evident at both post-test and follow-up. While both RS-Secure Base and RS-Safe Haven groups showed comparable improvements on most outcomes, RS-Secure Base demonstrated stronger effects for parental efficacy, particularly at follow-up. These findings have important implications for future work with relational savoring, suggesting that savoring both Secure Base and Safe Haven memories can enhance maternal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.