Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239220›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

A phenomenological study on the traces of obstetric violence in women's birth experiences.

Kubra Karabulut, Aysegul Unutkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kubra KarabulutKutahya Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7028-086X
Aysegul UnutkanDepartment of Midwifery, Kutahya Health Sciences University Health Sciences Faculty, PO Box 43700, Kutahya, Türkiye. aysegul.unutkan@ksbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0311-2177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn this study, we aimed to examine women's birth experiences in the context of obstetric violence. DESIGN &

methodThis is a qualitative study examining women's birth experiences phenomenologically. The research data were collected from 25 pregnant women who visited the Training and Research Hospital Electronic Fetal Monitorization outpatient clinic who were in the last trimester of pregnancy and who had previously given birth vaginally. Descriptive information form and semi-structured interview form were used for data collection. A thematic content analysis approach was used to analyze the data. Thematic content analysis was performed based on the obstetric severity classification proposed by Bohren et al. and Bowser and Hill. MAXQDA 20 software program was used to code the data.

resultsWomen's birth experiences were grouped under three themes linked to obstetric violence: dignified care, loss of autonomy, abandonment in care. Under these themes, eight categories were created: physical violence, verbal violence, deprivation of privacy, it was as if I did not exist, the medicalization of childbirth, intimidation/threatening with bad consequences to get what they wanted, midwives were like robots, I felt forgotten.

conclusionIt was determined that women were exposed to different types of obstetric violence during the delivery process. In order to prevent obstetric violence, it is important to increase the awareness of midwives, obstetricians, and care recipients on the issue and to solve structural problems such as lack of resources.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricParturitionPregnant PeopleViolenceAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPrivacyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAbuseBirth experienceDisrespectLaborMidwiferyMistreatmentObstetric violence

Identifiers

PMID41239220
PMCPMC12619142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.