Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239336›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviours: screening and intervention in primary care, a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled, stepped-wedge study.

Nicolas Pinsault, Sophie Rey, Léo Druart, Agnès Helme Guizon, Romain Debru, Matthieu Roustit, Christophe Pison

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06678906 (Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06678906 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior: Screening and Intervention in Ambulatory Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2025 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsPrimary CareArmsIntervention arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas PinsaultDépartement de kinésithérapie, University of Grenoble Alpes, Saint Martin d'Hères, France.
Sophie ReyDépartement de kinésithérapie, University of Grenoble Alpes, Saint Martin d'Hères, France.
Léo DruartDépartement de kinésithérapie, University of Grenoble Alpes, Saint Martin d'Hères, France.
Agnès Helme GuizonGrenoble IAE-INP, University of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, 38000, France.
Romain DebruUniversity of Savoie Mont Blanc, IAE Savoie Mont Blanc, Annecy, France.
Matthieu RoustitUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, Grenoble, CIC 1406, France.
Christophe PisonLaboratoire de Bioénergétique Fondamentale et Appliquée, LBFA, Inserm1055, University of Grenoble Alpes, Saint Martin d'Hères, France. christophe.pison@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity and sedentary behaviours (PiA/SED) are among the major modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases. Behaviour change models for PA can shape personalised interventions leading to sustainable lifestyle changes. We hypothesise that screening for PiA/SED by a general practitioner, followed by a personalised intervention by a physiotherapist, could reduce PiA/SED in inactive adults.

methodsWe designed a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled, step-wedge study. Adult patients without chronic illnesses will be recruited in 8 multi-professional health centres. They will receive educational content on PiA/SED. During the intervention periods, patients will see a physiotherapist for a functional assessment, and an intervention aimed at improving PiA/SED using a serious game. Two follow-up appointments at months 2 and 4 (M2-4) are planned to maintain patient motivation. At M6, a 7-day actimetry will be performed, and at M6-12, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews will close the study. Two primary endpoints will be analysed using a pre-specified hierarchical sequential analysis: the proportion of patients changing PiA/SED at M6. Secondary objectives include: 1-describing changes in PiA/SED at M6 and M12, 2-exploring the link between patient characteristics and changes in PiA/SED, 3-describing participants' quality of motivation, satisfaction of basic psychological needs, feelings of self-efficacy, perceived levels of vitality and energy, and self-esteem, 4-describing the strategies, barriers and facilitators of behavioural changes, 5-studying the correlation between questionnaires measuring physical activity and actimetry, 6-identifying the perceived barriers and facilitators to implement this care pathway. Assuming that 10% of patients in the control period will improve their PA and that the intervention will increase it by 20%, 160 patients provides 82% power to observe a significant difference. DISCUSSION: This design will harmonise the skills of all professionals in the field of motivational support for PiA/SED and providing information about the risks associated with PiA/SED. Patients in the intervention group will also receive individual support for behaviour changes related to PiA/SED. Considering public health, this study will contribute to increase primary prevention by healthcare professionals. Finally, this study will assess the effectiveness, adherence, satisfaction of the stakeholders involved in this pathway allowing to consider its implementation in routine primary care. SPIRIT 2025 CHECKLIST OF ITEMS: see supplement files.

trial registrationClinicalTrials n° NCT06678906, https://clinconnect.io/trials/NCT06678906#about-company-tab , first registration October 14, 2024, Trial updated February 05, 2025.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrimary Health CareSedentary BehaviorAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesGeneral practitionerPhysical activityPhysical inactivityPhysiotherapistPrimary careRCTSedentary lifestyleSerious game

Identifiers

PMID41239336
PMCPMC12619489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.