ArticleGenome medicine2025
Development of a consensus molecular classifier for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a consensus molecular classifier for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Differential gene expression profiles of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas among African American and Caucasian American patients.Translational oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a significant challenge, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Tumor heterogeneity contributes to the limited effectiveness of treatments. Several tumor and stroma molecular classifiers have attempted to clarify this heterogeneity with moderate agreement. Recognizing the complexity introduced by this extensive array of taxonomies, this study aims to develop a consensus molecular classifier by including both tumor and stroma features.
methodsWe analyzed mRNA expression data from 514 PDAC samples, applying batch correction, filtering out low-expression genes, and using variance-stabilizing transformation. Tumor and stroma profiles were classified with previously published systems, while stroma compartments were estimated through virtual microdissection. For each classifier, multiple machine learning models were trained and optimized, with the top performers used to assign subtypes. A consensus classifier was created by building subtype similarity networks and applying a Markov clustering algorithm, and robustness was evaluated through resampling. Associations between consensus classes and overall survival were examined using multivariate Cox models.
resultsThe results indicated that Elastic-Net emerged as the superior model. We identified two classes for tumor components (Consensus Classical and Consensus Non-classical) and stroma components (Consensus Normal-Immune and Consensus Activated-ECM). The consensus Random Forest achieved a balanced accuracy of 96.33 and 98.92%, respectively. Across cohorts, the PDAConsensus algorithm identified tumor subtypes with distinct prognostic value, with Consensus Non-classical tumors showing poorer survival than Consensus Classical tumors. Associations for stroma consensus classes were weaker and less consistent across datasets.
conclusionsWe developed a robust consensus classifier for PDAC that integrates tumor and stroma features. The classifier is accessible through the R package PDACMOC (PDACMolecularOmniClassifier, https://github.com/pavillos/PDACMOC , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17161373 ) and a Shiny app ( https://pdacmoc.cnio.es/ ). This classifier offers a biologically grounded framework that integrates existing systems, allows for single-sample classification, and improves prognostic stratification. By enabling subtype-specific therapies and better patient stratification in clinical trials, it can help guide precision medicine and enhance outcomes in PDAC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.