ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation: experience from a German stroke center.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discharge outcomes of intravenous alteplase 4.5-24 hours after symptom onset in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke: a propensity score-matched real-world study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Heparin-calibrated anti-factor Xa activity as a surrogate marker for direct oral anticoagulant levels in acute stroke care: a large observational single-center study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation: experience from a German stroke center" by Mers et al.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Response to the letter to the editor regarding "safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with direct oral anticoagulation".Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke after recent direct oral anticoagulant intake: toward evidence-informed care.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes and bleeding events associated with tirofiban combined with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke: a retrospective single-center study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite current guidelines recommending against intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) within prior 48 h, latest real-world data indicate no increased bleeding risk. However, these observations are based mainly on alteplase (rt-PA), whereas data for tenecteplase (TNK) are scarce.
methodsWe retrospectively compared data from our stroke registry of AIS-patients with DOAC (intake within the last 48 h), who received IVT either with rt-PA or TNK without prior antagonization. The primary outcome was the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) per SITS-Most criteria. Secondary outcomes included the rate of any ICH or major bleeding, rate of mortality, neurological and functional outcome at discharge.
results82 AIS-patients were included, with 42 patients receiving TNK und 40 patients receiving rt-PA. Median age was 83 y for TNK patients and 82 y for rt-PA patients. Median NIHSS score at admission for TNK was 9 points for both groups (p = 0.61). Median drug-specific DOAC plasma level was 49 ng/mL for TNK versus 24 ng/mL for rt-PA (p = 0.04). We found no statistically significant increased risk for neither sICH (TNK 2.4% vs. rt-PA 2.5%; p = 1), nor for other safety outcomes for TNK-treated patients compared with rt-PA. The rate of excellent functional outcome (TNK 61.9% vs. rt-PA 52.5%) was similar among both groups. High drug-specific DOAC plasma levels were not related to an increased rate of hemorrhagic complications in our cohort.
conclusionWe report no increased rate of (s)ICH for TNK based IVT compared with rt-PA in AIS-patients with DOAC, indicating a similar safety profile. Moderate to high drug-specific DOAC levels were no surrogates for hemorrhagic complications, supporting the implementation of specific Standard Operating Procedures for IVT in DOAC-treated patients. Contrary to previous studies, we did not observe an increased rate of early recanalization of LVO in TNK-treated patients in this small single-center cohort.
trial registrationn/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.