ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
The clinical relevance of hyper-reflective foci in the inner retina at the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyper-Reflective foci (HRF) increased in the inner retina (IR) of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS).
objectiveTo evaluate the risk of therapeutic failure, based on HRF count at baseline.
methodsFifty-seven pwMS were included in this retrospective, cohort, single-centre study. All patients were enrolled at clinical onset and were treatment-naive, with no evidence of optic nerve involvement. Patient were divided at baseline based on the MS treatment in platform-therapy pwMS (PTpwMS) and as High efficacy therapy pwMS (HETpwMS). Then, all PTpwMS were followed up (87.6±31.2 months) to evaluate the time to therapeutic switch for lack of efficacy on outcomes. HRF count was expressed as the sum of both eyes in Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GCIP), Inner Nuclear Layer (INL) and Inner Retina (IR, GCIP + INL).
resultsSurvival analysis confirmed an increased risk of therapeutic switch in those patients with a higher HRF-INL count (Log-Rank p < 0.0001, H.R. 7.9,
conclusionsHRF might be a useful marker to predict the risk of acute demyelination in MS and might give help Neurologist in therapeutic decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.