ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025
Protein biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension: advances, clinical relevance, and translational challenges.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Endostatin, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anemia among older people: a secondary analysis of the screening for CKD among older people across Europe (SCOPE) study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Epigenetic Regulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells During Development and Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disease characterized by pulmonary vasoconstriction and right ventricular dysfunction. Although classical circulating biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are widely used in clinical settings, their low specificity and substantial variability limit their diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. In recent years, emerging protein biomarkers, such as Apelin, Osteopontin, and Endostatin, have provided deeper insight into disease mechanisms but require further validation. The advent of high-throughput proteomic platforms, including SOMAscan, Olink, and mass spectrometry-based assays, has revolutionized biomarker discovery by enabling the identification of novel candidates with greater sensitivity and specificity. Several proteomics-discovered biomarkers, including LTBP-2, IGFBP family members, NET4, TSP2, and FGF-23, have demonstrated superior prognostic value and may complement or surpass current standards in risk stratification. In this review, we comprehensively examine the landscape of circulating protein biomarkers in PAH, compare key proteomic technologies, and highlight translational challenges such as assay standardization and cohort heterogeneity. We propose an integrative approach combining proteomic, imaging, and genomic data to enhance precision diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies for patients with PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.