ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Sustained effect of a multifaceted VAP prevention program over more than seven years including the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the long-term impact of a multifaceted intervention bundle containing nine measures to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care division at Geneva University Hospitals over a prolonged follow-up period of more than seven years, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The original study included a follow-up of 11 months and showed a marked decrease in VAP incidence. We compared the five pre-defined time periods (pre-intervention, intervention, post-intervention, prolonged follow-up, and COVID-19 pandemic period) using a Poisson model. The incidence of VAP per 1000 ventilator days reduced from 24.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.8-30.9) in the pre-intervention period to 3.9 (95%CI 2.0-6.8) in the post-intervention period. During the prolonged follow-up and the COVID-19 pandemic periods, VAP incidence per 1000 ventilator-days remained similar as in the initial post-intervention period with 4.0 (95%CI 2.9-5.4) and 3.7 (95%CI 2.8-4.7), respectively. Adherence to the bundle measures was assessed using the monthly percentage of correct observations and shown overall for each of the five time periods. Adherence to all but two bundle measures (oral care and hand hygiene) remained high or even improved during the prolonged follow-up period. In conclusion, after implementing a VAP prevention bundle in 2014, there was a sustained effect on VAP incidence during a 7-year follow-up, including the COVID-19 pandemic period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.