Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239850›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026

Genetic Evaluation of Beef Sires Using a Beef-on-Dairy Crossbred Reference Population.

Julius Mugambe, Christin Schmidtmann, Jorge Hidalgo, Rana Ahmed, Georg Thaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Evaluation of Beef Sires Using a Beef-on-Dairy Crossbred Reference Population.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julius MugambeDepartment of Animal Biosciences, SLU, Interbull Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-292X
Christin SchmidtmannInstitut für Tierzucht Und Tierhaltung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Jorge HidalgoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-381X
Rana AhmedInstitut für Tierzucht Und Tierhaltung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Georg ThallerInstitut für Tierzucht Und Tierhaltung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture 28RZ3101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, Beef-on-Dairy (BoD) crossbreeding programs have gained momentum to enhance dairy cattle's economic and genetic merits while meeting the demand for high-quality beef. However, bulls with superior growth potential can lead to calving problems; thus, Holstein dairy farmers must decide which semen to use to avoid calving problems while producing heavier BoD calves. In this study, our objective was to genetically evaluate beef sires using a BoD crossbred reference population for three major economic traits, i.e., gestation length (GL), birth weight (BW), and calving ease (CE). A population comprising 4420 BoD calves sired by bulls from Angus (ANG), Limousin (LIM), Wagyu (WAG), and White-Belgian Blue (WBB) was used to perform a joint genetic evaluation of the sire for traits. Univariate and bivariate (linear-linear or threshold-linear) models were applied to estimate variance components and genomic breeding values using single-step methods. Estimates from CE models were transformed from the liability to the observable scale for more straightforward interpretation. Direct heritabilities for GL, BW, and CE (after transformations) ranged from 0.33 to 0.35, 0.33 to 0.37, and 0.02 to 0.14, respectively, while maternal heritabilities ranged from 0.11 to 0.17 for all traits. Generally, male BoD calves had higher probabilities for calving difficulty, with calvings being more difficult if sired by LIM (13%) as compared to ANG (7%) and WBB (9%) when considering male calves. The bivariate models outperformed the univariate models. For CE, the accuracy of predictions was up by 95% with a reduction in bias and dispersion. WBB sires were preferred when crossing with higher parity cows compared to ANG sires. These findings demonstrate that a well-structured BoD reference population enables accurate genomic evaluation of beef sires, facilitating the selection of sires that produce economically viable calves with reduced calving difficulties.

Indexed as

BreedingAnimalsBirth WeightCattleFemaleHybridization, GeneticMalePregnancyRed Meatbeef‐on‐dairybirthweightcalving easethreshold‐linear models

Identifiers

PMID41239850
PMCPMC13054129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.