ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Comparison of t-PTK + CXL and CXL with mechanical debridement for keratoconus: fellow eye study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare visual, refractive, tear function, and ocular surface outcomes of accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) performed with transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (t-PTK) versus mechanical epithelial debridement in fellow eyes of patients with keratoconus.
methodsThis retrospective, comparative, fellow-eye study included 52 eyes of 26 keratoconus patients, each with a thinnest corneal thickness greater than 450 µm before the procedure, who underwent accelerated CXL with two different epithelial removal techniques. One eye received t-PTK-assisted epithelial removal and the fellow eye mechanical debridement. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), refractive and topographic parameters, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), tear function tests, pain scores, epithelial healing time, and demarcation line depth were assessed up to 12 months postoperatively.
resultsEpithelial healing time and pain scores were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Demarcation line depth and endothelial cell counts showed no significant difference. At postoperative month 12, the t-PTK group demonstrated significantly improved CDVA and UCVA, reduced spherical equivalent, keratometric values, corneal astigmatism, and total HOAs, whereas no significant improvements were observed in the mechanical group. Tear break-up time significantly decreased in both groups, while Schirmer test results and corneal staining remained unchanged. No significant haze was detected in either group.
conclusionWhile epithelial healing, ocular surface parameters, and safety outcomes were similar between techniques, t-PTK-assisted epithelial removal provided superior long-term visual, refractive, and topographic improvements compared with mechanical debridement. Accelerated CXL following t-PTK may offer enhanced therapeutic benefit for selected keratoconus patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240241What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.