Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41240312›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026

Models of Intracellular Transport: Contradictions and Current Understanding.

Alexander A Mironov, Galina V Beznoussenko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander A MironovDepartment of Cell Biology, IFOM ETS-The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy. alexandre.mironov@external.ifom.eu.
Galina V BeznoussenkoDepartment of Cell Biology, IFOM ETS-The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular transport is one of the most complex and debated topics in cell biology. Numerous models and their combinations have been proposed to explain experimental data on this process. This article describes our current understanding of the secretory pathway by analyzing different transport models. To identify the most realistic model, we identified observations that cannot be fully explained by the vesicular, diffusion, or cisterna maturation-progression models. The kiss-and-run model appears as the most powerful. From this perspective, vesicles at the ER exit sites are considered to be COPI-dependent. In cells with the central Golgi, the movement of carriers between the Golgi and peripheral structures occurs along microtubules via a bolus-like mechanism. In cells lacking microtubules, free ER-to-Golgi and Golgi-to-plasmalemma (or Golgi-to-endosome) carriers are extremely rare. Intra-Golgi transport relies heavily on temporary connections between cisternae, which subsequently break down. Cisternal perforations play a crucial role in this process. Cargo moves directionally through the Golgi stack, reaching the last two medial-cisternae and/or the trans-most cisterna, which function as the Golgi exit site. At this point, the dynamics of transport shifts from linear cargo movement to an exponential decay pattern. Post-Golgi carriers have to replace their own SNAREs with SNAREs that are able to facilitate their fusion with the plasmalemma.

Indexed as

Golgi ApparatusModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiological TransportEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansMicrotubulesCisterna maturation-progression modelDiffusion modelIntracellularKiss-and-run modelVesicular (dissociation) model

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.