Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41240314›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2026

Plant Golgi and GECCO: The Universality of ER-Golgi Interface.

Yoko Ito, Tomohiro Uemura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoko ItoInstitute for Human Life Science, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan. ito.yoko@ocha.ac.jp.
Tomohiro UemuraGraduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of its highly conserved molecular constituents, the Golgi apparatus shows diverse morphologies depending on the organism and cell type. In particular, in plant cells, the distribution and dynamics of the Golgi differ considerably from that seen in their mammalian or yeast counterparts. The architecture of the ER-Golgi interface, the first transfer station of the whole secretory traffic, has also been thought to differ between plants and the better-known mammalian system that possesses the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). However, detailed observations with plant cells gave rise to the identification of GECCO, the ER-Golgi intermediate that is likely to correspond to the mammalian ERGIC. The existence of compartments that are seemingly different, but still share common features across multiple eukaryotic kingdoms, highlights the universality of the ER-Golgi interface. In this chapter, after summarizing the characteristics of the plant Golgi, we will introduce the findings about GECCO by comparing plants with mammals and yeast. In addition, we will discuss the universal identity of the ER-Golgi intermediate compartments in order to transcend the morphological diversity for a deeper understanding of the ER-Golgi interface.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusPlantsAnimalsHumansERGICGECCOGolgiMembrane trafficPlant

Identifiers

PMID41240314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.