ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
A medium throughput approach for single cell copy number variation sequencing towards efficient application in clinics.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSingle-cell copy number variation sequencing (scCNV-seq) is essential for genomic analysis. However, existing methods rely on whole-genome preamplification or special devices, suffering from high cost and biased CNV calling. These challenges are significant in clinical scenarios where cells are precious and limited.
objectivesWe aimed to provide a convenient, efficient, and accurate scCNV-seq method with a data analysis workflow for clinical application with confident output while eliminated limitations above.
methodsWe developed traceable medium-throughput scCNV-seq (msCNVS). This method directly labels cells in a microplate using barcode-containing modified Tn5 transposomes, enabling early pooling to streamline processing and circumvent preamplification. MsCNVS simultaneously barcoded currently 48 but scable up to 96 or 384 cells, followed by dual indexes (i5, i7) for library construction. A new bioinformatic algorithm, two-dimensional fitting, was also outlined for accurate ploidy and copy number determination.
resultsMsCNVS reliably distinguished unique CNV patterns among 5 cell lines comprising 292 cells. Individual msCNVS profiles of 70 K562 cells exhibited high correlation (R = 0.90-0.98) with bulk sequence. Triplicates of HeLa bulk cells demonstrated near-perfect correlation (R = 0.99). No evident cross-contamination of reads was detected when mouse and human cells were processed together. The CNV profiles of 47 single cells from primary amniotic fluid cell cultures were validated via karyotyping and microarray. MsCNVS obtained superior coverage uniformity versus MDA and MALBAC, approached the level achieved by eMDA and DOP-PCR, and showed less fluctuation than PTA. Notably, msCNVS detected CNV deletions in two abnormal blastocysts (totaling 33 cells), including one exhibiting CNV mosaicism. It also revealed CNVs in 24 circulating tumor cells, 35 cancerous pleural effusion cells, and 152 patient-derived xenograft nuclei. All these results clearly set apart confident absolute CNVs from ambiguous fuzzy zones.
conclusionmsCNVS promises a robust and highly efficient CNV-seq approach for precious and rare cells typically encountered in reproductive and cancer clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.