ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Artificial Intelligence in Environment and Human Health: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitigating environmental public health risks via artificial intelligence: mechanisms and boundary conditions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges for assessing planetary health, particularly in environmental health. As a key determinant of human well-being, the environment significantly influences health. Although the application of AI in these areas has garnered increasing attention, a comprehensive evaluation framework is still lacking. In this review, we bridge this gap by proposing a unified evaluation framework that spans the entire environmental health research continuum, from modeling environmental exposures to assessing health outcomes and inferring causal relationships. We synthesize recent methodological innovations, application scenarios, and emerging trends across these interconnected domains. Our work highlights how AI can enhance accuracy, scalability, and causal understanding in environmental health studies. By emphasizing this integrated perspective, this review underscores AI's synergistic potential in addressing complex environmental health challenges and informing planetary health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41243050What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.