SynthesisAnnals of medicine2025
Dietary salt intake and cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and dose-response evidence.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Quality Along a Plant-Based Continuum: The Role of Added Salt, Oil, and Sugar in Chronic Disease Risk.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Time-varying eating behaviors and long-term risk of incident hypertension in a Japanese cohort.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of potassium-containing low-sodium salt substitutes for cardiovascular disease prevention in mixed adult populations: an umbrella review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of Dry-Cured Ham Consumption on Cardiometabolic and Vascular Health in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Intervention Studies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Same Brand, Different Risk: Global Processed Foods and Cardiometabolic Health.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- The Slovenian Nutrition Guidelines 2025: A Comparison with the Prior Slovenian FBDG, Dietary Intake, and the EAT-Lancet Diet.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unmasking hidden pathways: how household air pollution and lifestyle are associated with quality of life in Yunnan outpatients.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive salt intake is a known cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, but the health impacts of both high and low sodium intake remain debated. This study synthesize meta-analytic evidence on dietary salt intake and cardiovascular outcomes, including subgroup and dose-response analyses.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through August 28, 2024, for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
results21 meta-analyses comprising 91 outcomes were included. Low sodium intake was associated with reduced risks of CVD mortality (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73-0.95), stroke mortality (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.93), as well as systolic blood pressure (MD = -3.39 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (MD = -1.54 mmHg), improved vascular elasticity, and increased heart rate. Urinary sodium excretion and Na/K ratio decreased, while urinary potassium, calcium, and serum potassium increased. No adverse effects on lipid profiles were observed. High salt intake was associated with increased risks of CVD (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20), hypertension (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.24-1.42), stroke (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.19-1.51), and stroke mortality (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.21-1.63). Each 1 g/day sodium increase raised systolic blood pressure by 0.60 mmHg and CVD and stroke risks by 4% and 6%, respectively.
conclusionHigh salt intake increases cardiovascular risk, while moderate reduction provides protective benefits without adverse lipid effects. Tailored strategies are needed based on regional, sex-specific, and methodological differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.