ArticlePathologica2025
Clinical autopsy: methodological applications and scientific perspectives in post-mortem diagnostics.
Article in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asphyxial Mechanisms in Sand Burial, Findings and Diagnostic Challenges-A Case Report and a Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Micro- and nanoplastic exposure as an emerging risk factor for depressive-like phenotypes across species: a systematic review.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze mortality from natural causes in hospital and out-of-hospital settings using clinical autopsy, emphasizing its methodological rigor and scientific contributions. Methods: The present retrospective study included 1,340 autopsies conducted at the Umberto I General Hospital (2017-2023). Standardized protocols were applied, including complete autopsies, ancillary investigations (histopathology, imaging, microbiology, genetics), and systematic data collection. Results: Out of 912 natural deaths, cardiac pathologies were the leading terminal cause (70.3%), followed by vascular (10.4%) and respiratory disorders (7.0%). Males (71%) predominated, with peak mortality between 55-74 years. Ancillary methods were crucial in identifying causes, particularly in individuals < 30 years where macroscopic findings were absent. Genetic studies helped identify hereditary cardiac conditions, enabling preventive family screening. Conclusions: Clinical autopsy remains indispensable for determining the cause of death and improving diagnostic accuracy. A rigorous, standardized approach with ancillary methods enhances scientific understanding and public health interventions. Expanding post-mortem diagnostics and promoting centralized facilities is vital for quality mortality assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.