Evidence mapPaperPMID 41244547Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Effectiveness of the continuing care model for improving quality of life, cardiac function and outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease combined with heart failure after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study.

Chunyan Huang, Dan Liu, Jingjing Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chunyan HuangChunyan Huang, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province 321000, P.R. China.
Dan LiuDan Liu, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province 321000, P.R. China.
Jingjing LinJingjing Lin, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province 321000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objective: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the mainstay for coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment, is associated with some adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs). This study aimed to assess the impact of different nursing care models on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) complicated by heart failure (HF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methodology: This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, involving 183 patients diagnosed with CHD combined with HF who underwent PCI between May 2021 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into a continuing care group or a routine care group according to the post-PCI care model they had received. Quality of life was assessed using the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Cardiac function was evaluated through the six minutes' walk test (6-MWT), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. All participants were followed up for six months after PCI to record ventricular remodeling and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Results: After six months of follow-up, the continuing care group showed significantly higher HPLP-II and SF-36 scores, LVEF, and 6-MWT results, and lower NT-proBNP levels than the routine care group. Compared with routine care, continuing care was associated with a significantly lower incidence of ventricular remodeling (17.20% vs. 30.00%) and MACEs (44.09% vs. 66.67%). Conclusion: Continuing care has the potential to enhance quality of life and cardiac function in patients with CHD and HF following PCI while reducing the incidence of ventricular remodeling and MACEs.

Indexed as

Cardiac functionContinuing careCoronary heart disease combined with heart failureMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionQuality of lifeVentricular remodeling

Identifiers

PMID41244547
PMCPMC12616354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.