Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244618›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Real-World Data from 1,000 Patients Treated at the NCT Heidelberg between 2014 and 2022.

Laura L Michel, Manuel Feisst, Verena Thewes, Dirk Jäger, Andreas D Hartkopf, Sara Y Brucker, Sabrina Uhrig, Philipp Ziegler, Matthias W Beckmann, Erik Belleville and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Laura L MichelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel FeisstInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Verena ThewesNational Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk JägerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas D HartkopfDepartment for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital, University Tuebingen, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Tuebingen-Stuttgart (CCC-TS), NCT-SouthWest, Tübingen, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital, University Tuebingen, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Tuebingen-Stuttgart (CCC-TS), NCT-SouthWest, Tübingen, Germany.
Sabrina UhrigDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp ZieglerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Erik BellevilleClinSol GmbH & Co KG, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian MaurerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
Katharina SmetanayDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carlo FremdDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, targeted therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have improved significantly. In this analysis, we evaluated overall survival (OS) data of a prospectively documented cohort of 1,000 patients with mBC treated at the NCT Heidelberg from 2014 to 2022. Patients and Methods: Clinical data were prospectively collected and documented in the Prospective Academic Translational Research PRAEGNANT Network. OS was analyzed according to molecular subtype and line of therapy at study entry. We further evaluated the clinical characteristics associated with long-term (>5 years) and short-term (<1 year) survival. Results: The median age at first diagnosis of metastasis was 57 years. A total of 132 patients (13%) presented with triple-negative, 189 (19%) with HER2 positive, and 609 (61%) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC. Median OS was 31.7 months. The longest median OS was observed in patients with HER2-positive and luminal A-like mBC (42 and 39 months, respectively). Patients with luminal B-like and triple-negative mBC showed significantly shorter OS (21 and 14 months, respectively). In univariable Cox regression analysis, significantly shorter OS was associated with higher tumor grade; negative estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status; triple-negative molecular subtype; use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; and later line of therapy at study entry. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that higher tumor grade, negative ER and HER2 status, triple-negative or luminal B-like tumor biology, and study entry during later lines of therapy were the main risk factors for shorter OS. At 5-year follow-up, 17% of patients were still alive. Long-term survivors (>5 years) were more frequently ER, PR, and HER2 positive, received less often (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and had a longer disease-free interval. Conclusion: This single-center, real-world analysis of 1,000 mBC patients revealed significant OS differences across molecular subtypes and provided valuable information on prognostic factors. These findings underscore the impact of tumor biology and the need for personalized treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Metastatic breast cancerMonocentric natureOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID41244618
PMCPMC12618037

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.