ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Construction and validation of a predictive model for exclusive breastfeeding at discharge based on the information-motivation-behavioral skills theory.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the well-established health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for both mothers and infants, breastfeeding rates in China remain suboptimal. This study, guided by the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model, aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for exclusive breastfeeding at discharge to facilitate the early identification of high-risk mothers and enable timely clinical interventions. Methods: In this prospective observational study conducted from February to June 2025, a total of 623 postpartum women were recruited, with 592 meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 448 were allocated to the model development group, while 144 from a different hospital formed the external validation group. Demographic and breastfeeding-related variables were collected via questionnaires and electronic medical records. Logistic regression was employed to identify significant predictors and construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and externally validated using an independent cohort. Results: Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified newborn sex, early skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding attitude, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and LATCH score as significant predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. The nomogram exhibited good discriminatory ability, with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.81) in the development group and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.75) in the validation group. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model calibration ( Conclusion: This study successfully constructed and preliminarily validated a pure breastfeeding prediction model based on the IMB theory. The model demonstrates good calibration and moderate discriminatory ability, enabling clinicians to identify mothers at higher risk for exclusive breastfeeding failure early before discharge. Although its external validation performance suggests that its generalizability requires further validation in larger samples and more centers, its robust theoretical foundation positions it as a valuable risk assessment and screening tool. This provides a meaningful reference framework and methodological starting point for developing precise, efficient, and targeted nursing interventions in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.