ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Potential biomarkers in early detection of gastric cancer.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The annual burden of gastric cancer (GC) is increasing, highlighting a major threat to global public health. An important contributing factor to the increased fatality of the disease is the late stage at which GC is usually detected. Recent advancements in genomic and molecular studies have spearheaded the discovery of novel biomarkers for early-stage GC. Enabled by metabolomic, genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic signatures, these biomarkers have the potential to change the diagnostic outlook for GC. Such biomarkers would allow the detection of disease in its early stages, thereby improving the quality of life of those affected by this disease and also lowering the mortality rate. This review aims to provide a thorough overview of the novel biomarkers in GCs. Furthermore, this review addresses the mechanism by which these biomarkers are linked to the detection of GC and their possible utilization in clinical settings. This review comprises several novel biomarkers such as heat shock protein family A6 (HSPA6), annexin A11 (ANXA11), cell division cycle 42 (CDC42), fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAP), hepcidin antimicrobial peptide (HAMP), solute carrier family 25 member 4 (SLC25A4), serpin peptidase inhibitor clade H member 1 (SERPINH1), cystatin B, deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 (DMBT1), nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1), N6-methyladenosine-related lncRNAs, circular RNAs, and proteinase 3 (PRTN3). Thus, the aim of this review is to gather and incorporate the current state of knowledge on this topic to point out the need for persistent research and innovation in the field of identification of GC biomarkers. This will enable the opportunity for new and more effective strategies for combating GC, which will further reduce its global burden and improve patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.