ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Is Emerging Nanomedicine a Friend or Foe to Germ Cells?
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials are increasingly applied in biomedicine and have significant potential in reproductive medicine. However, because they can impact germ cells, use of nanomaterials could represent a "double-edged sword", whose benefits must be balanced with the possible risks. Because of their excellent physicochemical properties, nanoparticles (NPs) can serve as multi-functional platforms for targeted drug delivery, enhancing outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies, refining in vitro culture systems, and improving the precision of diagnostic imaging. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence indicates that various NPs, including metallic and polymeric forms, can accumulate in reproductive tissues and induce detrimental effects, primarily through increased oxidative stress, DNA damage, and activation of apoptotic pathways. Moreover, NPs can directly compromise gamete quality and function: in oocytes, NP exposure can disrupt key processes, such as meiotic spindle assembly and chromosomal segregation; while in sperm, NPs can impair critical functions, such as histone-to-protamine exchange and mitochondrial integrity. The delicate balance between the benefits and risks of NP use are profoundly influenced by their physicochemical properties. This review critically assesses the "friend or foe" duality of NP use in reproductive medicine, by systematically analyzing their beneficial applications in contrast with their potential for NP-induced toxicity. Mechanistic pathways of NP toxicity are described, and the necessity of a safety-focused approach for the future development of reproductive nanomedicine is emphasised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.