ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Unmet needs in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive approaches: perspectives from a European expert panel.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frailty and health resource utilization in 5450 adults with acute myeloid leukaemia: A population-based study from Ontario, Canada.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Caring for Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Best Practices for Aligning Patient Fitness and Preference with Available Therapies.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients: An Updated Canadian Consensus.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Personalized Venetoclax Dose Adjustment in Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-Life Case Series Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- From Selection to Use: Aptamers as Targeting Reagents in Hematology.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is primarily a disease of the elderly, with increasing age associated with worse outcomes. Treatment options include intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents with/without venetoclax, and best supportive care. Although the treatment landscape for AML has progressed in recent years, survival in older, frail patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy remains poor. To address this, a panel of European experts convened to discuss the key factors influencing AML prognosis in older patients and/or those deemed unfit for intensive therapy. The panel shared perspectives on AML outcomes, patient fitness, treatment choices, and unmet needs. Experts agreed that although age is an important factor in guiding therapeutic decision making, other factors should also be considered such as comorbidities and the impact of disease biology (e.g., cytogenetic/molecular aberrations). Experts also agreed that more robust assessments of patient fitness are required, such as the utilization of geriatric assessment tools. As choice of therapy and its associated toxicities can impact patient's quality of life (QoL), the logistical, psychosocial, and financial challenges experienced by the patient and their support network needs to be considered when determining treatment. Finally, experts agreed that outcomes in older, unfit patients with AML remain suboptimal in part due to the impact of treatment-related toxicities and QoL burden. There is therefore an urgent need for alternative treatments which minimize toxicity and reduce QoL burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.