Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245164›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025

Conceptualizing Attachment Trauma: A Developmental Trauma Perspective.

Julian D Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julian D FordProfessor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attachment trauma, as cogently formulated by Farina and Schimmenti (2025), involves traumatic experiences that fundamentally disrupt attachment bonding with primary caregivers and result in impairments in core self and relational capacities that include but extend beyond the symptoms of formal psychiatric nosology. An overview is provided of a clinical framework that similarly is grounded in clinical and scientific evidence of the adverse effects of a combination of traumatic victimization and attachment disruption, Developmental Trauma Disorder (DTD). Six domains of self-dysregulation are identified by DTD, including affective, somatic, attention/ memory, behavioral, interpersonal, and self-identity coherence, and evidence linking the features of DTD with attachment trauma is summarized. This commentary concludes that attachment trauma, as formulated by Farina and Schimmenti, offers an important framework to enable providers, theorists, and researchers to develop clinical formulations and approaches to treatment that explicitly recognize and directly address the all too often overlooked alterations in core self-regulatory capacities that result from coping with the traumatic disruption or loss of attachment security.

Indexed as

adultattachmentchilddevelopmental traumaemotion regulation

Identifiers

PMID41245164
PMCPMC12614175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.