ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Conceptualizing Attachment Trauma: A Developmental Trauma Perspective.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuing the Conversation for a Clinical Conceptualization of Attachment Trauma.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attachment trauma, as cogently formulated by Farina and Schimmenti (2025), involves traumatic experiences that fundamentally disrupt attachment bonding with primary caregivers and result in impairments in core self and relational capacities that include but extend beyond the symptoms of formal psychiatric nosology. An overview is provided of a clinical framework that similarly is grounded in clinical and scientific evidence of the adverse effects of a combination of traumatic victimization and attachment disruption, Developmental Trauma Disorder (DTD). Six domains of self-dysregulation are identified by DTD, including affective, somatic, attention/ memory, behavioral, interpersonal, and self-identity coherence, and evidence linking the features of DTD with attachment trauma is summarized. This commentary concludes that attachment trauma, as formulated by Farina and Schimmenti, offers an important framework to enable providers, theorists, and researchers to develop clinical formulations and approaches to treatment that explicitly recognize and directly address the all too often overlooked alterations in core self-regulatory capacities that result from coping with the traumatic disruption or loss of attachment security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.