ReviewCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2025
The Interplay Between CA19-9 and the Lewis Blood Group System: Implications for the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer.
Review in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging omics diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Specific diagnostic value of systemic immune-inflammation indices combined with nutritional and tumor markers in the stage diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CA19-9 is one of the most widely applied tumor markers in clinical oncology, particularly in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of biliary tract and pancreatic cancers. However, its clinical utility is limited by biological variability, most notably the influence of the Lewis blood group system, which may result in false-negative findings. The Lewis system is composed of three major phenotypes, Le(a+b-), Le(a-b+), and Le(a-b-), with the less frequent Le(a+b+) also reported in certain populations. Current evidence indicates that CA19-9 expression occurs predominantly in Le(a+b-) or Le(a-b+) individuals, whereas it is largely absent in Le(a-b-) individuals. Insufficient consideration of this factor in clinical settings reduces diagnostic accuracy and complicates interpretation of CA19-9 results. This review summarizes the current understanding of the relationship between CA19-9 and the Lewis system, critically evaluates recent clinical studies, highlights existing limitations, and discusses the potential role of combined CA19-9 and Lewis typing in improving the diagnostic value of gallbladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.