ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Green design in living and bedroom spaces: exploring environmental restorativeness and affective qualities of spaces.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Therapeutic Home Environment for Chronic Diseases: A Transdisciplinary Ecosystem for Achieving Migraine Freedom and Managing Comorbid Anxiety, Insomnia, and Chronic Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous research has suggested that the introduction of greenery into built environments has positive effects on individuals' physical and psychological well-being. However, these studies have primarily focused on public spaces, overlooking domestic environments. Additionally, different types of greenery and the influence of individual differences in environmental evaluations have not been adequately considered, all of which are the main objectives of this study. Method: A total of 331 adults (18-67 years old) evaluated various images of domestic interiors (bedrooms and living rooms) designed with different furnishing conditions (no greenery, with potted greenery, and integrated greenery), rating perceived restorativeness and the affective qualities of the spaces. Results: Results showed that rooms with greenery were perceived as more restorative and associated with more positive affective qualities. The direct integration of plants into the furniture made the spaces more fascinating and less monotonous, but also more chaotic and less coherent compared to the use of potted greenery. Furthermore, individuals with higher openness to experience and a stronger connection to nature tended to evaluate environments as generally less chaotic. Discussion: Overall, the findings demonstrate that a biophilic design approach enhances perceived restorativeness and the evaluation of indoor spaces, thereby contributing to the overall well-being of their occupants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.