ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Food acceptability and selection by astronauts on International Space Station missions informs strategies and risks for deep space exploration.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Spaceflight-Induced Oxidative Stress and the Critical Role of Diet and Microbiome.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Yeast-driven biomanufacturing in space: synergizing cellular agriculture for sustainable extraterrestrial habitats.NPJ microgravity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterization of the relationship between food system acceptability and repeat consumption within the spaceflight food system may be linked to caloric intake but the impact of food acceptability and repeat consumption has not been previously systematically investigated. In this study, 15 astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) reported acceptability of the items in one meal a week over approximately 6-month and 1-year missions. The results indicated that acceptability scores did not decrease over the mission. Astronauts limited selections to their personal favorites early in the mission and did not consume foods they did not like. Although they continued to like the foods they chose, many foods were not rated by more than one individual, supporting variability in personal preference. Intake of only liked foods from mission start may impact total variety and quantity available to each astronaut within the restricted system on ISS, which may ultimately impact total nutritional intake. It also increases the challenge for exploration missions, where food may be pre-positioned and personal preferences may not be accommodated. Astronaut comments indicated specific food types and strategies that may help improve food system acceptability for future missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.