ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Dentin Hypersensitivity Treated With Diode Laser and Aminefluoride: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of lasers in restorative dentistry: a review and update.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of amine fluoride (AF) gel with or without diode laser application on pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Methods: The numerical rating scale (NRS) index was used to assess the pain experienced by each patient. The pain response was elicited by a thermal stimulus (cold air blast). The sample included 43 patients, for a total of 86 dental elements with a split-mouth design, 27 females and 16 males, with an age range between 18 and 68 years. The teeth were divided into two groups. The treatment group, consisting of 43 teeth, was treated with 980 nm diode laser (doctor smile wiser by Lambda s.p.a. Via dell'Impresa, 1,36040 Brendola VI, Italy) and AF gel (Elmex Dental Gel, Colgate-Palmolive company, New York, 300 Park Ave, United States); the control group, consisting of 43 teeth, was treated with AF gel only. Only one treatment session was performed for each group. Follow-up visits were scheduled for each patient at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months. At these follow-up sessions, the pain response was reassessed using the NRS index. Results: The results of this study showed a significant reduction in pain in both groups ( Conclusions: The laser combined with the AF gel guarantees a better result on reduction of tooth sensitivity compared to the AF gel alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.