ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Association between cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, lifestyle, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction at the Intersection of CKM Syndrome: Molecular Mechanisms and Path-to-Target Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- Liver fibrosis biomarkers as a prognostic tool beyond the defining components in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome is reported to be associated with increased all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. However, the association between CKM and cancer-specific mortality, as well as the modifying or joint effects of healthy lifestyle on mortality remain unclear. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled participants aged 37-73 years from the UK Biobank. Individuals with missing data on CKM status, lifestyle factors or potential confounders at baseline (between March 2006 and July 2010) were excluded. Followed-up was conducted until November 30, 2022. CKM stages (0-4) were defined per the American Heart Association criteria. A healthy lifestyle score (adequate physical activity, no current smoking, healthy sleep, and healthy diet) was categorized into unfavourable (0-1), intermediate (2-3), and favourable (4) groups. Outcomes included all-cause and cause-specific mortality (due to cardiovascular disease [CVD], cancer, and other causes). Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazards models were used to assess associations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, respectively. Findings: A total of 319,291 participants were included. Over a median follow-up of 13.7 years (interquartile ranges 13.0-14.3), 27,267 deaths occurred (5558 CVDs [20.4%], 13,566 cancers [49.8%], 8143 other-causes [29.8%]). Compared with CKM Stage 0, Stages 2-4 were associated with progressively higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HRs] (95% confidence intervals [CIs]): Stage 2: 1.21 [1.12-1.30]; Stage 3: 1.54 [1.43-1.66]; Stage 4: 2.30 [2.13-2.49]), CVD-specific mortality (Stage 2: 2.38 [1.74-3.24]; Stage 3: 4.46 [3.23-6.14]; Stage 4: 10.40 [7.61-14.21]), and cancer-specific mortality (Stage 2: 1.15 [1.03-1.28]; Stage 3: 1.26 [1.12-1.41]; Stage 4: 1.32 [1.17-1.48]). In addition, Stages 3 and 4 were positively associated with other-cause mortality (Stage 3: 1.49 [1.29-1.72]; Stage 4: 2.08 [1.81-2.38]) (all Interpretation: Participants at CKM stages 2-4 demonstrated a graded increase in the risks of all-cause, CVD-specific, and cancer-specific mortality, particularly among younger adults. Having a healthy lifestyle can mitigate these risks, highlighting the importance of lifestyle intervention, especially through non-smoking, adequate physical activity, and healthy sleep duration. As both CKM stage and lifestyle were assessed solely at baseline and the study is observational in nature, the findings may be subject to unmeasured temporal variability and residual confounding, which should be considered when interpretating the results. Funding: The National Key Research and Development Plan: Real-Time Intelligent Active Intervention on Integration of Ten Important Chronic Diseases, and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.